Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 36
Filter
1.
researchsquare; 2023.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-3150104.v1

ABSTRACT

Background Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) is a genetic auto-inflammatory disease. Mutations in the MEFV gene cause inappropriate immune system triggering, leading to inflammatory episodes in the peritoneum, pleura, and joints. In the severe COVID-19 picture, the hyperimmune response and inflammatory process develop and the clinic worsens. The FMF disease, the drugs used for its treatment, and the situation that different genetic mutations will display in the course of COVID-19 arouse interest.Methods In this study, common and different points in COVID-19 follow-up processes were evaluated by online questionnaire method according to different gene mutations in 158 FMF patients who had gene analysis. Participants were asked 21 questions and the data provided were compared between FMF MEFV gene mutationsResults 104 out of 158 cases did not get COVID-19. 8 of 54 cases who get COVID-19 were hospitalized. No statistically significant difference was found between gene mutations when evaluated and compared in terms of susceptibility to COVID-19, vaccination status and presence of additional chronic diseases.Conclusion The present study provides guidance on the role of FMF genetic mutations in the course of COVID-19. Our study may suggest that FMF MEFV gene mutations do not have a protective role against COVID-19. The results also suggest that, as an inverse effect, MEFV gene mutations do not increase the risk of hyper-immune response and SARS, which play a role in the severe course of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Positive-Pressure Respiration, Intrinsic , Familial Mediterranean Fever
2.
researchsquare; 2023.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-3140344.v1

ABSTRACT

Background: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has robustly affected the global healthcare and economic systems. The causative agent is coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). The clinical presentation of the disease ranges from a flu-like illness to severe pneumonia and death. Till September 2022, the cumulative number of cases exceeded 600 million worldwide and deaths were more than 6 million. Colchicine is an alkaloid drug that is used in many autoinflammatory conditions e.g., gout, familial Mediterranean fever, and Behçet’s syndrome.  Objective: The aim of the current study was to assess the evidence of colchicine effectiveness in COVID-19 treatment.  Patients and methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was done till May 2022 and yielded 814 articles after ranking the articles according to authors and year of publication. Only 8 clinical trials and cohort studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included for further steps of data collection, analysis, and reporting.  Results: The results showed that colchicine resulted in a significant reduction in the mortality rate among patients received colchicine in comparison with placebo or standard care (RR 0.35, 95%CI: 0.15- 0.79). Colchicine resulted in a significant decrease in the need for O2 therapy in patients with COVID-19 (RR 0.07, 95%CI 0.02-0.27, P=0.000024). However, colchicine had no significant effect on the following outcomes among COVID-19 patients: the need for hospitalization, ICU admission, artificial ventilation, and hospital discharge rate. Among the PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients, colchicine decreased the hospitalization rate (RR 0.75, 95%CI 0.57-0.99, P=0.042). However, colchicine had no effect on mortality and the need for mechanical ventilation among this subgroup.  Conclusion: Colchicine caused a significant clinical improvement among COVID-19 patients as compared with the standard care or placebo, in terms of the need for O2, and mortality. This beneficial effect could play a role in the management of COVID-19 especially severe cases.


Subject(s)
Gout , Pneumonia , Death , COVID-19 , Familial Mediterranean Fever
4.
Iran J Med Sci ; 48(1): 43-48, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2205676

ABSTRACT

Background: In December 2019, an outbreak of pneumonia caused by the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) became a pandemic and caused a global health crisis. This study evaluates the immunogenic potential of the Mediterranean fever (MEFV) gene in patients with COVID-19. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from March to April 2020 in various COVID-19 referral centers in Ardabil, Iran. Blood samples of 50 hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 were evaluated for MEFV gene mutation using the amplification refractory mutation system polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-PCR) and Sanger sequencing. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 22.0. Results: Mutations of the MEFV gene were found in 6 (12%) of the patients. All mutations were heterozygous, and no homozygous or compound heterozygous forms were detected. The total mutant allele frequency was 6% and the carrier rate was 12%. The most common allele of the MEFV variant was E148Q, detected in 3 (6%) patients. No mutant variant of the MEFV gene was detected in deceased patients. None of the mutation carriers had familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) symptoms or a family history of FMF. Conclusion: MEFV gene mutations may have immunogenic potential in patients with COVID-19. A preprint version of this article has already been published at https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-69373/latest.pdf.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Familial Mediterranean Fever , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pyrin/genetics , Mutation , Familial Mediterranean Fever/epidemiology , Familial Mediterranean Fever/genetics
8.
Pharmacol Res ; 182: 106293, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1882440

ABSTRACT

The innate immune system is critically involved in the pathogenesis of familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), characterized by dysregulated inflammasome activity and recurrent inflammatory attacks: this is the most common among monogenic autoinflammatory diseases, which shares some biochemical pathways with the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. In this short review we explore the overlap in the pathophysiology of FMF and SARS-CoV-2 infection, discussing how to understand better the interaction between the two diseases and optimize management. A poorer outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection seems not to be present in infected FMF patients in terms of hospitalization time, need for oxygen support, need for intensive care, rate of complications and exitus. Long-term surveillance will confirm the relatively low risk of a worse prognosis observed so far in SARS-CoV-2-infected people with FMF. In these patients COVID-19 vaccines are recommended and their safety profile is expected to be similar to the general population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Familial Mediterranean Fever , COVID-19 Vaccines , Colchicine , Familial Mediterranean Fever/complications , Familial Mediterranean Fever/genetics , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
9.
Int J Rheum Dis ; 25(7): 787-794, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1868566

ABSTRACT

AIM: To determine frequency of adverse events and attacks related to vaccination in recipients of CoronaVac and BNT162b2 in familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) patients, and to search whether history of prior COVID-19 or a booster dose increases occurrence of adverse events/attacks. METHODS: FMF patients were surveyed for administration of any COVID-19 vaccine and vaccine-related adverse events or FMF attacks. Demographic, clinical, vaccine-related data, history of COVID-19 infection before or after vaccination, adherence to FMF treatment during vaccination were collected. RESULTS: A total of 161 vaccinated FMF patients were included. Ninety-three patients out of 161 had reported suffering from an adverse event/attack after a vaccine dose. There were 54.7% of BNT162b2 recipients who reported any adverse event after any vaccine dose in comparison to 29.9% of CoronaVac recipients (P < .001). There were 22.2% of BNT162b2 recipients who reported suffering from a FMF attack within 1 month after vaccination in comparison to 19.4% of CoronaVac recipients (P = .653). When patients with or without adverse event/attack were compared, no significant differences were observed in means of demographics, comorbid diseases, disease duration, total vaccine doses, or treatments adhered to for FMF. Rates of adverse events/attacks were similar between patients with and without prior COVID-19. In booster recipients, adverse events/attacks were most frequent after the booster dose. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable number of FMF patients suffered from vaccine-related adverse events/attacks, particularly with BNT162b2. No serious events or mortalities due to vaccination were detected. Demographics, clinical characteristics and prior history of vaccination did not significantly affect these results. We observed an increased rate of adverse events/attacks with booster dose administration.


Subject(s)
BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Familial Mediterranean Fever , BNT162 Vaccine/adverse effects , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Colchicine/therapeutic use , Familial Mediterranean Fever/drug therapy , Humans
10.
Rheumatol Int ; 42(6): 973-987, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1772906

ABSTRACT

Most of the published data relate to classical forms of rheumatic diseases (RD) and information on rare inflammatory disorders such as Behçet's syndrome (BS) and familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is limited. We studied the frequency of side effects and disease flares after COVID-19 vaccination with either Pfizer/BioNTech or Sinovac/CoronaVac in 256 patients with BS, 247 with FMF, and 601 with RD. Telephone interviews were conducted using a questionnaire survey in a cross-sectional design in patients with BS, FMF, and RD followed by a single university hospital. Study participants were vaccinated either with CoronaVac (BS:109, FMF: 90, and RD: 343,) or BioNTech (BS: 147, FMF: 157 and RD: 258). The majority have received double dose (BS: 94.9%, FMF 92.3% and RD: 86.2%). BioNTech ensured a significantly better efficacy than CoronaVac against COVID-19 in all patient groups (BS: 1.4% vs 10.1%; FMF: 3.2% vs 12.2%, RD:2.7% vs 6.4%). Those with at least one adverse event (AE) were significantly more frequent among those vaccinated with BioNTech than those with CoronaVac (BS: 86.4% vs 45%; FMF: 83.4% vs 53.3%; and RD: 83.3% vs 45.5%). The majority of AEs were mild to moderate and transient and this was true for either vaccine. There were also AEs that required medical attention in all study groups following CoronaVac (BS: 5.5%, FMF: 3.3%, and RD:2.9%) or BioNTech (BS: 5.4%, FMF: 1.9%, and RD: 4.7%). The main causes for medical assistance were disease flare and cardiovascular events. Patients with BS (16.0%) and FMF (17.4%) were found to flare significantly more frequently when compared to those with RD (6.0%) (p < 0.001). This was true for either vaccine. BS patients reported mainly skin-mucosa lesions; there were however, 11 (4.3%) who developed major organ attack such as uveitis, thrombosis or stroke. Flare in FMF patients were associated mainly with acute serositis with or without fever. Arthralgia/arthritis or inflammatory back pain were observed mainly in the RD group. Our study demonstrates that BS and FMF patients vaccinated with either CoronaVac or BioNTech demonstrated similar AE profile and frequency compared to RD patients. AEs that required physician consultation or hospitalization occurred in all study groups after either CoronaVac or BioNTech. Increased frequency of flares in BS and FMF compared to that seen in RD might reflect defects in innate immunity and deserves further investigation. Caution should be required when monitoring these patients after vaccination.


Subject(s)
Behcet Syndrome , COVID-19 , Familial Mediterranean Fever , Rheumatic Diseases , Behcet Syndrome/complications , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , Familial Mediterranean Fever/complications , Humans , Pain/complications , RNA , Rheumatic Diseases/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccines, Inactivated
12.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 61(SI2): SI129-SI135, 2022 06 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1722588

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Evidence suggests a possible association between the COVID-19 vaccine and autoimmune disease flares or new onset of various autoinflammatory manifestations, such as pericarditis and myocarditis. The objective of this study was to assess the safety of an mRNA-based BNT162b2 anti-COVID-19 vaccine in individuals with FMF, a prototypic autoinflammatory disease. METHODS: Patients participating in this study fulfilled the criteria for diagnosis of FMF, were older than 18 years and received at least one dose of the vaccine. Data on baseline characteristics, features of FMF, post-vaccination side effects, and disease flares were acquired using electronic medical files and telephone interviews. RESULTS: A total of 273 FMF patients were recruited for the study. >95% were vaccinated with two doses of the vaccine. The rates of local reactions following the first and second vaccine doses were 65.5% and 60%, respectively, and 26% and 50.4%, respectively, for systemic adverse events. These rates are lower than those reported for the general population from real-world and clinical trial settings. Postvaccination FMF activity remained stable in most patients. None of the patients reported an attack of pericarditis or myocarditis, considered the most serious vaccine-associated adverse events. Patients with a more active FMF disease and patients harboring the M694V mutation had a significantly higher rate of post-vaccination systemic side effects and attacks. CONCLUSION: The BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine is safe in patients with FMF. Our results support the administration of this vaccine to FMF patients according to guidelines applicable to the general population.


Subject(s)
BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 , Familial Mediterranean Fever , Myocarditis , Pericarditis , BNT162 Vaccine/adverse effects , COVID-19/prevention & control , Familial Mediterranean Fever/genetics , Humans , Myocarditis/complications , Pericarditis/complications , RNA, Messenger
13.
researchsquare; 2021.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-1156651.v1

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Systemic autoinflammatory disease (SAID) is a rare systemic auto-inflammatory and progressive disorders. There have been some reports with various therapies in SAID patients. The objective of this study is to describe the chareatercis of four cases of NAIDs benefiting from JAK 1/2 inhibitor baricitinib. Methods: : We reported the four cases with SAID including two cases of Blau syndrome, one case of FMF and one case of FCAS3 syndrome. These four different patients were either resistant to currently available therapies or biologics were unaccessible during COVID-19 pandemic. We also conducted a systematic literature review about the current therapies of SAID. Results: : Although genetically and phenotypically different, four cases of SAID that were treated with single use baricitinib 4 mg per day achieved improvement over eight weeks. We further identified 132 manuscripts providing more than 100 cases of SAID. Among these patients, 24 underwent biological treatments and 22 of them recovered. In these 132 manuscripts, 2 underwent JAK 1/3 inhibitor tofacitinib treatment and recovered fully. Conclusions: : Case series study on the use of Jak inhibitor agents have yielded positive results in our study. For SAID patients baricitinib may be a better choice compared to injection biological treatments.


Subject(s)
Hereditary Autoinflammatory Diseases , COVID-19 , Familial Mediterranean Fever
14.
Mod Rheumatol ; 32(2): 467-472, 2022 Feb 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1569714

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the course of coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) infection in paediatric familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) patients and to investigate the risk factors for COVID-19 infection. METHODS: Medical records of 100 consecutive paediatric FMF patients and their COVID-19 infection status were evaluated. Age- and gender-matched control group consisted of 51 patients with positive results for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. RESULTS: Twenty-five of 100 paediatric FMF patients were detected to have COVID-19 infection. A history of contact with a COVID-19 case was present in ∼95% of patients in both the FMF and control groups with COVID-19 infection. Asymptomatic infection was detected in two patients in the paediatric FMF group (8.0%) and 17 patients in the control group (33.3%) (P = .017). Mild disease was observed in 23 paediatric FMF patients (92.0%) and 28 control patients (54.9%) (P = .001), whereas moderate disease was present in only 6 control patients (11.7%) (0 vs 11.7%, P = .074). Severe or critical disease was not observed in any patients. CONCLUSION: Paediatric FMF patients receiving colchicine had no moderate COVID-19 disease compared to the control group. We suggest that colchicine use may tune down the severity of the disease even if it does not prevent COVID-19 infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Familial Mediterranean Fever , COVID-19/complications , Child , Colchicine/therapeutic use , Familial Mediterranean Fever/complications , Familial Mediterranean Fever/diagnosis , Familial Mediterranean Fever/drug therapy , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
15.
Mod Rheumatol ; 32(6): 1108-1113, 2022 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1546003

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a rare but severe condition associated with coronavirus disease 2019. Here we aimed to raise awareness for the symptoms of MIS-C in patients with rheumatic diseases, emphasizing the challenges of the differential features. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory and imaging findings, treatments, and outcomes of six MIS-C patients with previous rheumatic disease. RESULTS: Three of the patients had familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), one had juvenile dermatomyositis, one had systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), and another patient had oligoarticular JIA. All FMF patients presented with fever and abdominal pain, two also had chest pain. The patient with systemic JIA presented with fever, rash, and myalgia. All patients had elevated inflammatory markers and high d-dimer levels. Chest imaging of two FMF patients showed infiltrations compatible with pneumonia. One FMF patient had mildly decreased systolic functions with a shortening fraction of 48% in his echocardiography. Intravenous immunoglobulin and methylprednisolone were administered to all patients. Anakinra was given to four patients. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and laboratory signs of MIS-C may overlap with the findings of various rheumatic diseases, and this may cause a delay in diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Juvenile , COVID-19 , Collagen Diseases , Familial Mediterranean Fever , Rheumatic Diseases , Arthritis, Juvenile/complications , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Child , Collagen Diseases/complications , Familial Mediterranean Fever/drug therapy , Fever , Humans , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein/therapeutic use , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Rheumatic Diseases/complications , Rheumatic Diseases/diagnosis , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome
16.
researchsquare; 2021.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-1043860.v1

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has reinforced the importance of having sufficient, well-distributed and competent health workforce. In addition to improving health outcomes, increased investment has the potential to generate employment, increase labour productivity along with fostering economic growth. With COVID-19 highlighting the gaps in human resources for health in India, there is a need to better and empirically understand the level of required investment for increasing the production of health workforce in India for achieving the UHC/SDGs. METHODS: The study used data from a range of sources including National Health Workforce Account 2018, Periodic Labour Force Survey 2018-19, population projection of Census of India, and review of government documents and reports. The study estimated shortages in the health workforce and required investments to achieve recommended health worker: population ratio thresholds by the terminal year of the SDGs 2030. RESULTS: Our results suggest that to meet the threshold of 34.5 skilled health worker per 10,000 population, there will be a shortfall of 0.16 million doctors and 0.65 nurses/midwives in the total stock of human resources for health by the year 2030. The shortages at the same threshold will be much higher (0.57 million doctors and 1.98 million nurses/midwives) in active health workforce by 2030. The shortages are even higher when compared with a higher threshold of 44.5 health workers per 10,000 population. The estimated investment for the required increase in the production of health workforce ranges from INR 523 billion to 2,580 billion for doctors. For nurses/midwives, the required investment is INR 1,096 billion. Such investment during 2021-25 has the potential of an additional employment generation within the health sector to the tune of 5.4 million and contribute to national income to the extent of INR 3,429 billion annually. Conclusion: India needs to significantly increase the production of doctors and nurses(/midwives) through investing in opening up of new medical colleges. Nursing sector should be prioritized to encourage talents to join nursing profession and provide quality education. India needs to set-up a benchmark of skill-mix ratio and provide attractive employment opportunities in health sector to increase the demand and absorb the new supply of graduates.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Familial Mediterranean Fever
17.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 57(2)2021 Jan 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1389436

ABSTRACT

Uncertainty analysis is the process of identifying limitations in knowledge and evaluating their implications for scientific conclusions. Uncertainty analysis is a stable component of risk assessment and is increasingly used in decision making on complex health issues. Uncertainties should be identified in a structured way and prioritized according to their likely impact on the outcome of scientific conclusions. Uncertainty is inherent to the rare diseases (RD) area, where research and healthcare have to cope with knowledge gaps due to the rarity of the conditions; yet a systematic approach toward uncertainties is not usually undertaken. The uncertainty issue is particularly relevant to multifactorial RD, whose etiopathogenesis involves environmental factors and genetic predisposition. Three case studies are presented: the newly recognized acute multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children and adolescents associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection; the assessment of risk factors for neural tube defects; and the genotype-phenotype correlation in familial Mediterranean fever. Each case study proposes the initial identification of the main epistemic and sampling uncertainties and their impacts. Uncertainty analysis in RD may present aspects similar to those encountered when conducting risk assessment in data-poor scenarios; therefore, approaches such as expert knowledge elicitation may be considered. The RD community has a main strength in managing uncertainty, as it proactively develops stakeholder involvement, data sharing and open science. The open science approaches can be profitably integrated by structured uncertainty analysis, especially when dealing with multifactorial RD involving environmental and genetic risk factors.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Familial Mediterranean Fever/epidemiology , Neural Tube Defects/epidemiology , Rare Diseases/epidemiology , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/epidemiology , Uncertainty , Causality , Familial Mediterranean Fever/genetics , Genotype , Humans , Knowledge , Phenotype , Rare Diseases/etiology , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
18.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 60(SI): SI85-SI89, 2021 10 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1320326

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence of hospitalization for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with FMF, as compared with the general population, and to compare the disease course between FMF inpatients, and age-, sex-, ethnicity- and comorbidity-matched non-FMF COVID-19 inpatients. METHODS: We used electronic medical records to obtain data about the total number of the insured population and the number of FMF patients in the two largest health management organizations in Jerusalem, Clalit and Meuhedet. The total number of COVID-19 inpatients at the Hadassah Medical Center, including those with FMF, for the period between 1 February 2020 and 10March 2021, was retrieved from the electronic medical records of Hadassah. COVID-19 course was compared between the FMF inpatient group and age-, sex-, ethnicity- and comorbidity-matched non-FMF COVID-19 inpatients. Each FMF inpatient was matched with two non-FMF controls. RESULTS: We found no statistically significant difference in the odds of hospitalization for COVID-19 between FMF patients and the non-FMF population (0.46% vs 0.41%, P = 0.73). Furthermore, we found similar disease severity and therapeutic approach in FMF COVID-19 inpatients and matched non-FMF COVID-19 inpatients. CONCLUSIONS: Neither FMF nor baseline colchicine therapy, appear to affect the incidence of hospitalization for COVID-19 or the disease course, in terms of severity and therapeutic approach.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Familial Mediterranean Fever/virology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/genetics , Case-Control Studies , Colchicine/therapeutic use , Familial Mediterranean Fever/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Incidence , Israel/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
19.
Z Rheumatol ; 80(7): 647-657, 2021 Sep.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1258199

ABSTRACT

Colchicine, the toxin of the autumn crocus, has various anti-inflammatory effects. For this reason, it is being used for the treatment of several autoinflammatory diseases, such as gout or familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). In addition, some interesting studies have been published which suggest the benefits of colchicine in cardiovascular diseases. Furthermore, various anti-inflammatory therapeutic approaches are currently being tested in clinical trials for the treatment of COVID-19. First publications suggest a potential benefit of colchicine in certain disease phases of the virus infection. This article provides an overview of the mechanisms of action, benefits and side effects as well as the various possible uses of colchicine in rheumatology. Furthermore, a brief preview of potential new areas for use of the drug, which are also of interest to rheumatologists, are presented.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Familial Mediterranean Fever , Rheumatology , Colchicine/therapeutic use , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
20.
Rheumatol Int ; 41(8): 1447-1455, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1241602

ABSTRACT

The study aimed to evaluate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) and to assess the relationships between FMF characteristics and severe COVID-19 outcomes such as hospitalization. The study was planned within a national network of 21 different centers. Demographics, FMF-related clinical and genetic characteristics, and COVID-19 outcomes were obtained. A total of 822 patients with FMF (mean age of 36 years) were included in the study. Fifty-nine of them (7%) had a COVID-19 diagnosis confirmed by real-time PCR test or chest CT findings. Most FMF patients with COVID-19 (58) had mild and moderate disease activity. All patients were on colchicine treatment. However, 8 of them (13.6%) were not compliant with colchicine use and 9 of them (15.3%) were colchicine resistant. Twelve FMF patients with COVID-19 were hospitalized. There were 4 patients requiring oxygen support. COVID-19 related complications were observed in 2 patients (1 thromboembolism, 1 acute respiratory distress syndrome). Hospitalized COVID-19 patients with FMF were older than non-hospitalized patients (median ages: 51 and 31 years, respectively; p: 0.002). Other FMF-related characteristics were similar between the groups. FMF-related characteristics were not found to be associated with poor outcomes in COVID-19. Thus, FMF may not be a risk factor for poor COVID-19 outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/virology , Familial Mediterranean Fever/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Adult , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Colchicine/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Databases, Factual , Familial Mediterranean Fever/drug therapy , Familial Mediterranean Fever/mortality , Female , Hospitalization , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Severity of Illness Index , Turkey , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL